What’s Reasonable About the Gun Debate?

Guns. This is a tough one. Or so they say.

My personal history with firearms is fairly long. I grew up with an interest in classic military weapons such as the M1 Garand rife my dad carried in Korea.  (General George Patton called it “the greatest battle implement ever devised”.)  Over time, my interest expanded, I earned my carry permit, and I built up a small collection of firearms. I even became a state-certified handgun carry permit instructor and earned various NRA certifications.  I’ve shot everything from a tiny .22 you can fit in the palm of your hand to a 20-something pound sniper rifle that fires a 50 caliber slug a distance of miles.  While I am not a hunter, I think I have more than a passing familiarity with firearms – and I think everyone who might encounter one should. Knowledge beats ignorance and fear every time.  However, there is more to this story than my experience. There is our national experience.

The statistics regarding firearms injuries and deaths paint an alarming picture. According to the Centers for Disease Control, about 33,000 people die from gunfire each year in this country.  That’s a rate of about 11.5-12 per 100,000 people.  Americans make up about 4.4 percent of the global population but own 42% of the world’s guns. From 1966 to 2012, 31 percent of the gunmen in mass shootings worldwide were American, according to a 2015 study conducted at the University of Alabama and reported in the New York Times.

This would seem to be a problem that is crying out for a solution.  And most Americans want one. According to Gallup,  there is a multi-decades history of a majority of Americans favoring stricter gun control. For example, large majorities of Americans -both Republican and Democrat- favor strong criminal background checks for firearms purchases.  Even 72% of NRA members support background checks!

The Supreme Court is even on the side of this majority. In the landmark “District of Columbia v Heller” decision, the court ruled that Americans have the right of self defense, but like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon any time for any reason. For example, concealed weapons prohibitions are legal, as are various prohibitions on who may carry arms, where they may be carried and what type of arms the right applies to.  Pp. 54–56.

In sum, guns are clearly a problem. The majority of Americans agree, want something done, and legal precedent clearly allows some regulation of firearms, even for self-defense.  (In fact the Tennessee Constitution specifically allows the regulation of arms for the prevention of crime.)

So, what’s the problem? Why can’t we fix this? What about the United States forces us to have one of the highest firearm-related death and crime rates in the developed world?  There are many causes, but our politicians and our system of election financing are two big ones.

The National Rifle Association (NRA) is a very strong lobbying organization boasting millions of members and millions of dollars in campaign contributions. The NRA spent between $55 and $70 million in campaign expenditures in 2016, with the overwhelming majority of funds supporting Republicans or attacking Democrats. An “F” rating by the NRA, seen as a badge of honor in liberal circles, can be a death knell to many politicians as the NRA will fund attack ads and opposition candidates to anyone who does not toe the line.  Many elected officials are scared of the NRA’s money, even if the NRA advocates positions many of its own members do not support.

In addition, the NRA has turned from its historical mission of gun safety and marksmanship to one of dismantling gun laws. This benefits the firearms manufacturing industry, who want to sell more guns. The relationship between the NRA and the industry is simply harmful to the health of Americans.

Where do we stand? We stand for reason. We believe the Supreme Court is correct when they say the 2nd Amendment is a not a free-for-all. We stand with the majority of Americans in favor of common-sense gun laws. We want background checks on 100% of firearms purchases. We want “bump-stocks’ outlawed. We want possession of military assault-style weapons and ammunition out of civilian hands as they are not designed for self-defense or hunting. We want stricter limits on who can own firearms.  We want firearms regulated like any other consumer product. We want the government to not be prohibited as it is now to conduct academic research on firearms issues. We want better training for carry permit holders.

In other words, we want what you likely want.

 

 

One Reply to “What’s Reasonable About the Gun Debate?”

  1. This is one of the reasons why the Democratic party in Sumner County is losing 3-1 against the Republicans and has been for the past 30 years. If you’re really so familiar with guns then how can you be behind banning “assault rifles”? Self defense is a valid cause. The gun debate in rural America is a nonstarter and is going to bleed even more would be Democrats to the Republican cause. I wouldn’t vote for someone with an F from the NRA. Democrats need a shift in strategy in Sumner County. They need to pivot to issues Tennessee voters could actually get behind. The focus on the national talking points instead of local problems is exactly what’s wrong with the organization as seen on the facebook page and this blog. It may score you points from your friends, but they shouldn’t be your audience. You need to convince undecideds to your cause. Calling for taking away people’s right to firearms is a terrible way to make gains. Losing 50k to 18k in 2016 should have been a wake up call. The Republican machine in Sumner County is laughing at you while it dominates every race in Sumner County.

    P.s. None of what I said was meant as an insult. I’ve been watching the fb page a few months and think y’all need to change your strategy to gain real political power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *